UMBILICAL
METASTASES OR SISTER MARY JOSEPH'S NODULES: A CASE REPORT
Louise Lee MAppSc(MU) BAppSc(MRT) AMS, Sonographer, Medical
Imaging Department, Gold Coast Hospital, Southport, Queensland
Umbilical
metastases are commonly known as Sister Mary Joseph’s
(SMJ) nodules. They account for 30% of all umbilical tumours
1 and are found more frequently in females (60%) than in
males (40%)2. This case study describes recurrent SMJ nodules
in a patient initially presenting with Dukes’ C carcinoma
of the colon.
Case
History
In October 1998, a 67 year old male presented with iron
deficiency anaemia and a history of minor erosive prepyloric
gastritis with helicobacter pylori on biopsy. On colonoscopy
a haemorrhagic obstructing carcinoma was identified at the
level of the hepatic flexure. There was also mild sigmoid
diverticular disease and an additional 5 mm benign sigmoid
polyp. Histologically the hepatic flexure lesion was an
infiltrating moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, consistent
with a colonic primary. The patient then progressed to surgery,
undergoing a right hemicolectomy. At surgery it was noted
that the adenocarcinoma invaded through the full thickness
of the colon wall extending into the pericolic fat. In addition
four out of ten pericolic lymph nodes were effected. This
classified the patient as having a Dukes’ C carcinoma
of the colon. Further staging showed a clear chest x-ray,
no liver metastases on abdominal ultrasound and his blood
screen (full blood count, liver function tests and tumour
markers) were within acceptable limits. Over the next six
months the patient underwent six courses of combination
chemotherapy (5FU and folinic acid).
In the twelve months following the chemotherapy the patient
continued to be well with normal blood tests, abdominal
ultrasounds and colonoscopies. In April 2001 the patient
presented with two nodules, one that had arisen in the umbilicus
and a subcutaneous one in the lateral margin of his scar.
Neither nodule was particularly tender with the patient,
on the whole, feeling well. His weight was stable and his
bowel motions were normal. His blood screen was essentially
normal with the exception of a slightly raised CA 19 of
43 kU/L (normal < 40). Computered tomography (CT) showed
an 8 mm lymph node in his chest with no other lesions in
his liver or abdomen. Soft tissue thickening of the abdominal
wall in the region of the umbilicus was noted. A more detailed
assessment of this region was carried out by ultrasound.
This showed a lobulated nodule of mixed echogenicity posterior
to the umbilicus with a similar appearing area lateral to
the patient’s scar. Fine needle aspiration of the
subcutaneous nodule and biopsy of the umbilical nodule showed
moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. This was believed
to have arisen from his previous bowel cancer. Excision
of the two nodules was carried out. The umbilical lesion
extended into the calciform ligament. Further chemotherapy
was suggested, however the patient declined. For the following
twelve months the patient felt well and displayed no symptoms.
The tumour marker levels decreased to within normal limits.
In march 2002, a screening CT detected liver lesions and
increased thickening of the anterior abdominal wall. Ultrasound
was carried out to characterise these areas. Unfortunately
the lesions within the liver were hypoechoic and solid in
nature, keeping with metastases. Assessment of the anterior
abdominal wall demonstrated three clusters of heterogeneous
nodular lesions surrounding the umbilicus.
Presently the patient is now starting to be symptomatic
with increasing abdominal pain, weight loss, fever and sweats.
Ultrasound monitoring of the abdominal wall and liver lesions
have demonstrated significant progression of his disease.
Liver function tests are now deranged. The patient is to
start palliative chemotherapy with the prognosis at this
point in time being relatively poor.
Citation
Lee L. Umbilical metastases or Sister Mary Joseph's nodules:
A case report. ASUM Bulletin 2002.3:18-19.
|