SURVEY
OF EXPECTANT PARENTS PRESENTING FOR THE 18-20 WEEK FETAL
ULTRASOUND: THEIR OPINION ON THE VIDEOTAPING ISSUE AND EXPECTATIONS
OF THE SCAN
Alison L Webb DipAppSc (MRT) GradDipAppSc (Medical Ultrasonongraphy),
AMS, Senior Sonographer at the Christopher Kohlenberg Department
of Perinatal Ultrasound, Nepean Hospital, Penrith
Abstract
This ultrasound department does not provide a videotape
of any routine ultrasounds. The reasons behind this protocol
include concern that a videotape may be used as legal evidence,
prudent limitation of exposure at the fetus to ultrasound,
and the possibility of the sonographer being distracted.
A further concern is that by providing a video service we
might inadvertently promote the entertainment aspect of
prenatal ultrasound rather than emphasise its medical importance.
The department undertook a survey of 150 expectant mothers
arriving for their routine 18-20 week fetal anomaly scan
(FAS), and as many expectant fathers who were present and
willing to participate (53 agreed). It seemed paramount
that expectant parents should get the opportunity to express
their opinion on the videotaping issue as to date, published
material has stated the opinions of ultrasound professionals
and assumptions of our patients’ expectations.
Whilst it was determined that the majority of expectant
parents do desire a videotape of their FAS, the majority
in our catchment area are quite satisfied to receive a few
still images of their baby instead of a videotape. It was
also learned that the majority of expectant parents are
ill-informed of the limitations of prenatal ultrasound.
Citation
Webb A. Survey of expectant parents presenting for the 18-20
week fetal ultrasound: their opinion on the videotaping
issue and expectations of the scan. ASUM Bulletin 2002.2:11-15.
|